Baidu
map
CHINESE J AERONAUT 润色咨询

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

出版年份:暂无数据 年文章数:1672 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Bimonthly 自引率:19.8% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-08-27 1475ae60m28(暂无昵称)

    审稿速度:4.0
    经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-03-02 ms2473638683998620

    领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-12-09 ms2983094698733738

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-18 ms804033028710664

    顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-18 ms7780612574685936

    审稿速度:4.0
    经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。
    这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。
    总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。
    哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-18 ms61234328952836

    审稿速度:4.0
    经验分享:received: 4 march 2019
    revised: 5 august 2019
    accepted: 16 july 2019
    首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。
    一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。
    然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。
    接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-04-19 ms9885168513176188

    做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀?

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-01-17 ms7442275544109079

    一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-09-07 ms3124006784636534

    中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表!

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1012040, encodeId=f880101204047, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:别投别投别投 浪费时间 三个多月 说 主题不符合 早干嘛去了!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=68, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=bd585210252, createdName=1475ae60m28(暂无昵称), createdTime=Fri Aug 27 12:51:03 CST 2021, time=2021-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857985, encodeId=b37785e9859d, content=领军期刊了,换句话说就是国内的top,政策又开始反sci了,这下三航要拉开差距了,战术后仰 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Mar 02 20:39:54 CST 2020, time=2020-03-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855650, encodeId=40ee8556506c, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:目前这期刊过度追求国际化,再加上刚提为q1,所以对国内作者很容易拒稿,请慎重投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=144, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Mon Dec 09 16:11:38 CST 2019, time=2019-12-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852690, encodeId=dcd4852690e5, content=顺便回应下27楼,做仿真的也可以啊,我就是做的仿真,可能还是和内容有关。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:27:36 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852689, encodeId=5de9852689b1, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:航空学报(cja)现在在逐步走向国际范儿,一年出版量不多,现在比以前要难中了。期刊规定至少要又两个审稿人审稿,至少一个人是外国人。一般,ae会选择三个以上审稿人。据听说,只要有一个审稿人意见不积极,就基本给拒了,因为稿量太多了。<br> 这是第二篇论文,当时第一篇论文也投了cja,是做机器人的,结果等了五个月给了一个很无语意见,拒了。。。感觉还是投对点的内容,不然他们审的慢,或者就直接拒了。第二篇,不是老板让投,估计都不会投了,不过还好中了。 <br> 总体来说,cja还行,比较难中,主要还跟内容有关,偏向航空,听一个哥们说他投的宇航方面的被直接拒了,说内容不符。不过,后期稿件出版还得等好长时间,这个太费时间了,感觉性价比一般,国外有很多比cja好的期刊,都比他各方面要好一点。<br> 哈哈,接下来继续ast和ieee transactions。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=127, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:25:49 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852688, encodeId=d6be85268889, content=审稿速度:4.0<br>经验分享:received: 4 march 2019<br> revised: 5 august 2019<br> accepted: 16 july 2019<br> 首都某985直博生一枚,前后经历“大修-大修-录用”三个阶段。<br> 一共三个审稿人,第一次大约经历了一个半月,三个审稿人给的审稿意见都很专业,一针见血,对提升稿件质量有很大帮助。<br> 然后,花了将近二十天时间,对文章进行大改,又提交上去。差不多过了近一个半月,第二次意见下来,一个审稿人无意见,另一个审稿人有个疑问,让说明一下,第三个人对第一次意见回复比较满意,然后又提了一个新问题,这个问题提的很巧妙,也很有意义。<br> 接下来,我又花了五天左右修改,增补了一段新内容,再次提交。大约不到两周,通知被录用,让按要求修改,提交最终版。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c7555414117, createdName=ms61234328952836, createdTime=Thu Jul 18 22:24:52 CST 2019, time=2019-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850903, encodeId=2d7d850903c4, content=做仿真的,投过5篇,都是被拒。为什么上面有些文章就是仿真的呀? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=126, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=52925414013, createdName=ms9885168513176188, createdTime=Fri Apr 19 19:24:03 CST 2019, time=2019-04-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=849311, encodeId=4b9a849311f6, content=一审三个多月给了大修意见,二审两天录用。审稿速度还算可以 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5cee5414068, createdName=ms7442275544109079, createdTime=Thu Jan 17 15:17:55 CST 2019, time=2019-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847095, encodeId=978d84e0956d, content=中国的学术圈,乱的很,这个杂志就是杰出代表! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1eb45414156, createdName=ms3124006784636534, createdTime=Fri Sep 07 20:16:19 CST 2018, time=2018-09-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846417, encodeId=938484641ebd, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Sat Aug 18 21:21:45 CST 2018, time=2018-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-08-18 ms248080445684567

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:严重同意楼下观点,这个很一般,很多文章经不起推敲,假得很,都是三大航院的关系户,希望踢出sci

    0

共28条页码: 1/3页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map